This is also Jane Jacob's emphasis on the daily life of users, making the "body-urban space" a line, life is participation, and the relationship between people and the environment is re-focused. This anti-positivism and anti-modernist view of space as a tool and anti-Cartesian planning concept, plus time, becomes "body-time-urban space". The accumulation of users' daily life is the accumulation of time , to generate a new perspective on urban space, and then "re-create", which is place making and city making. 3 Photo Credit: Cuperus, YJ (2001).
An Introduction to Open Building.) Levels of decision making. Image Manipulation Service We also don't need to romanticize users' ability and willingness to participate in spatial change projects over time, as this must depend on the establishment of open systems. The Open builiding system of the post-war residential mass production period in the Netherlands accommodates a limited degree of occupant participation and at the same time conforms to the "frame system" of efficient mass production. This residential design method provided the answer to the efficiency/quality and individual needs of the post-war social task of building a large number of social housing, which was the social responsibility of architects at that time. One of the most important promoters is Habraken[1] who graduated from TU Delft and later taught at MIT (also the instructor of Chengda Wang Mingheng).
Habraken's Open building system provides the time dimension of space production. In the same way, in addition to residences, neighborhood spaces, and community spaces, users can also recreate them after a certain period of use. Whose public interest? Who is participating? Article 1 of the "Housing Law" states: "In order to protect the living rights of citizens, improve the housing market, improve the quality of living, and enable all citizens to live in suitable housing and enjoy a dignified living environment..." It is also promulgated every few years.